Follow the Process
From the client's first need to the drain they're still maintaining five years later. Pick a stage, or follow all 55 stops: watch what gets made, where it goes, and how its label changes along the way.
The process, stop by stop
Who's on the job Stage 0 · Why we need it
- Joins
- Leaves
- How it travels
Towns keep their places. They join when they're appointed, and leave when their part is done; what they made stays on the record.
Who's on the job, stage by stage
| Town | 0 Why we need it | 1 What we need | 2 First ideas | 3 Pinning it down | 4 Design it | 5 Make and build it | 6 Hand it over | 7 Use it |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Client Town | ||||||||
| Consultant Town | ||||||||
| Main Contractor Town | ||||||||
| Designer Town | ||||||||
| Supplier Town | ||||||||
| The Outskirts |
- Item
- Number
- Revision
- Status
- Can you build from it?
- Reason for issue
- Where
- Who's acting
- Recorded in the Site Office
| Item | Number | Rev | Status | Where |
|---|
Want the whole trail as a table, the rules, and every code? Turn on Show the detail at the top of the map.
Every stop, on one page
The same 55 stops as a table: the trail your CDE should be able to show for this one need. This is what "can you prove it?" looks like. Pick a row to see it on the map.
| Stop | Step | ISO 19650 | Item | Rev | Status (reason for issue) | Where | Spins off or links to |
|---|
Codes on this page: ABC is the design firm, LDF the lead firm, PRE the precast supplier and XYZ the client. IDs like ISS-031 and TQ-024 are illustrative.
The rules Eight rules of the trail
Drawing 042 has one revision history and many linked records. Everything else (issues, mark-ups, TQs, surveys, inspections, shop drawings, packs) is its own parcel, pointing back at the exact revision it relates to.
- The revision changes when the content changes. The status changes when the purpose changes. S4 to S5 on the same content is a change to the label in the CDE, not a re-issue.
- The status lives in the CDE. The sheet carries the revision and a PRELIMINARY or CONTRACTUAL stamp, matching the P or C. Where a client's title block insists on showing S codes, a status change becomes a content change: re-issue it with the description "Status change only, no technical change".
- A published code says which work stage it's accepted for (A5 is Stage 5, A6 is Stage 6), not why. So every published issue also carries a reason for issue from the project's information standard: For construction, For manufacture, Quality record, As-built survey, As-constructed record, Handover. (We say "as-built" in plain words; the reason for issue on the record drawing is As-constructed record.)
- Every town checks its own work before it leaves, and the check fits the parcel. A drawing is made, checked, reviewed and approved. A site form is filled in, checked and approved (signed by the supervisor, witnessed where the inspection plan says). A photo needs the right label as it's taken. InfoTown calls these make, check, review, approve; ISO 19650 calls them a quality assurance check, a review, and approval for sharing. Check, review and approve (the team's checkpoints) happen in work in progress, before anything moves to Shared, whoever made it. Authorise and accept (two more checkpoints: the lead firm authorises, then the client accepts) happen in the CDE, before anything moves to Published: the people come to the parcel, the parcel doesn't go to them, and the decision is recorded against the revision.
- Only the originator revises its own parcel, in its own room. A mark-up, issue or TQ never changes Drawing 042. It gives the designer a reason to.
- Once a drawing is contractual, rework goes back into work in progress as the next P revision: C01, then P04.01 and P04, then C02. Write this into the project's information standard.
- Feedback records carry a workflow state (Open, Responded, Closed), not a design status. If the project holds a mark-up as its own container, S2 is a sensible convention, never A.
- Every stop must answer "can you prove it?": who, when, which revision, and which record caused it.
Feedback What goes back: red-lines and everything like them
"The red-line goes back" covers at least seven different things. They all point at an exact revision, none of them revise it, and each one ends somewhere different.
| Feedback | When | Why it happens | Own ID? | Goes to | Ends as | Stop |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coordination issue | Design, S1 | Federated models clash or don't fit | Yes, issue register | The originator | Next P revision | Clash |
| Review comment | Design, S3 to S5 | A reviewer disagrees, queries or spots a gap | Comment, against the revision | The originator | Next P revision; comment closed with a response | Share for comment |
| TQ or RFI with a red-line | Before building | Site can't build as drawn | Yes; mark-up attached | Designer, via the lead firm | Answer and instruction, then the next C revision | Ask |
| Non-conformance (NCR) | After building | Built wrong or out of tolerance | Yes | Lead firm, designer if needed | Accept, repair or replace; record updated if accepted as built | – |
| As-built mark-up | As built | Small differences within tolerance; no question asked | Yes, or held in the work pack | Originator of the record drawing | Feeds the A6 record revision | Record mark-up |
| Survey | Before, during and after | Existing conditions, setting out, as-built check | Yes, with its own revisions | Designers and the record | Reference, setting-out data or as-built survey (A5) | Measure |
| Inspection and test record | At hold and witness points | Proving the work meets the published information | Yes | Quality record and handover pack | Quality record (A5), handed over | Inspect |
Three tests decide the route. Is it a question? Then it's a TQ or RFI, and someone with authority answers it before work goes ahead. Is it a defect? Then it's an NCR, and the decision on it says whether the record changes. Is it simply what happened? Then it's an as-built mark-up, survey or inspection, and it feeds the record. For models the same rule applies, with structured issues in place of red pen.
Supplier Town Shop drawings: who sees them
A shop drawing is a separate parcel owned by whoever makes the thing, based on a published design revision. It's never the designer's next revision. Who reviews it depends on who carries the design responsibility, and the contract and responsibility matrix should say so before the first one arrives.
| Who | What they check | Do they always see it? |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer (the originator) | Buildability, tolerances, its own checks: the team's checkpoints | Yes, they produce it |
| Designer of record | It matches the design intent of the revision it's based on, with no new design assumptions | Yes, where the item carries design intent: S3 for comment |
| Lead firm | Interfaces, logistics, programme, fit with everything else | Yes: it authorises at S4 and releases it as A5, For manufacture |
| Client | Only where the contract says so: contractor-designed elements, specified assets, safety-critical items | Not by default |
InfoTown's convention: here the lead firm authorises SD-118 at S4 and releases it as A5 because, by default, it's the accepting party for its own subcontract appointment. Where the client has listed shop drawings as deliverables it wants to review, they go on to S5 for the client to accept, like any other deliverable.
The trail must show which design revision each shop drawing relied on. When 042 moved from C01 to C02, someone had to check SD-118 was still valid. Linking them in the CDE makes that check happen on purpose, not by luck. A firm that designs and makes (a precast firm doing contractor-designed work, say) still sits in Supplier Town, but its design submissions follow the design line's rules.
The site Site packs
A site pack is a list of links to exact published revisions, held in the CDE, not a folder of copies. It answers "what was the site supervisor working from that day?".
- Only published items go in: drawings at A5 For construction, shop drawings at A5 For manufacture, the inspection plan, RAMS, permits, and any instructions or TQ answers that apply.
- Never in a pack: anything at an S status, red-lines, or superseded revisions.
- When a linked item is superseded (042 C01 to C02), the pack is updated, the change is recorded against it and the site team is told. Printed copies say "uncontrolled when printed, check the CDE".
- The pack has its own number and revision, so the trail can prove which version was on the tablet when the trench was dug.
- At the end, the pack's inspections and as-built records feed the record drawing and the handover pack. Packs organise construction; they aren't the handover.
Project choices Your project may do it differently
The map shows one good way. The workflow is the idea that matters; the systems and the details are your project's choice, written into its information standard and BEP.
| Choice | On this page | Also fine |
|---|---|---|
| Where work in progress lives | In each team's own system, in its own town. The Site Office only knows what's been shared. | Work-in-progress areas inside the CDE, one per team, so the CDE sees every version. The project decides. |
| What the CDE is | One Site Office: several cabins (documents, models, maps, the site app, data) inside one fence, running one workflow | Several systems: documents in a document system, models on a model server or in CAD, maps in GIS, a field app on site. It's still one CDE if it runs one workflow: the same states, labels and decisions, all recorded. |
| Whose CDE | A new Site Office, built by the lead firm because the client asked for one | The client's own CDE. Then getting ready means getting your team access and testing your workflows in someone else's building. |
| Where the client accepts | The client's reviewer comes to the Site Office | The client accepts in its own system. Then the parcel does travel up the client line, as a formal transfer, and the decision comes back to be recorded. |
| How people are told | One copy; the status changes where it sits; a notification with a link goes to everyone on the distribution | Connected systems pick up the new status through their own approved integrations, not side routes. If a system really needs its own copy (the client's document system, an offline tablet), it's a controlled transfer with the same number, revision and status, superseded when the original is. Never re-shared as a new parcel. |
| Stage names | InfoTown's names for Stages 0 to 7 | Your client's own stage gates |
| How the job is bought | Design and build: the client's consultants take it to the end of Stage 3, then the lead firm joins and brings its own designers | Build only: the client's designers carry on through Stage 4, and the lead firm joins to build. Stages 0 to 3 look the same either way; only who joins next changes. |
| Who designs after the tender | A new designer, appointed by the lead firm | Novation: the client's designer moves across to work for the lead firm. Their work and its record come with them and nothing is redrawn, but who checks and accepts their work changes. Say so in the responsibility matrix before the first drawing moves. |
Work stages Stage names, and the ones your job might use
Most UK schemes number the stages 0 to 7 and agree on the numbers, but not the names. InfoTown uses its own plain names. The number is what matters: it's the n in an A code.
| # | InfoTown | RIBA Plan of Work 2020 | A typical stage set |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | Why we need it | Strategic Definition | Strategy |
| 1 | What we need | Preparation and Briefing | Brief |
| 2 | First ideas | Concept Design | Concept |
| 3 | Pinning it down | Spatial Coordination | Definition |
| 4 | Design it | Technical Design | Design |
| 5 | Make and build it | Manufacturing and Construction | Build and Commission |
| 6 | Hand it over | Handover | Handover and Closeout |
| 7 | Use it | Use | Operation and End of Life |
ISO 19650 works with whatever stages your project uses: RIBA on buildings, the client's own gates on infrastructure. Your project's information standard should say which stages the A codes follow.
UK National Annex The codes used on this page
Status codes
| Code | State | What that means to you | Build from it? |
|---|---|---|---|
S0 | Work in progress | Someone is still working on it in their own team's area. You shouldn't normally see it, and you shouldn't rely on it. | No |
S1 | Shared | Shared so other teams can check their work fits around it. Expect it to change. | No |
S3 | Shared | Shared so people can comment on it. If you've been asked to review it, now's the time to speak up. | No |
S4 | Shared | Shared for the lead firm to review and authorise. | Not yet |
S5 | Shared | Shared for the client to review and accept. | Not yet |
A1, A2… An | Published | Authorised and accepted, with no comments outstanding. The number is the work stage: on this site A5 is construction and A6 is handover and the as-built record. | Yes, for that stage, if it's the latest |
An S code says what something may be used for. An A code only says it's been authorised and accepted, and the n is the work stage. The Annex ties n to the work stages in BS 8536-1 (buildings) and BS 8536-2 (infrastructure), since brought together in BS 8536:2022, unless your project's information standard sets out another approach. On this site, construction is stage 5 and handover is stage 6, so a construction issue is A5 and the as-built record is A6. Why each A code was issued isn't in the code at all: your project's information standard has to say.
Revision codes
| Code | When | What that means to you |
|---|---|---|
P01.01, P01.02… | Work in progress | Still being worked on. The second number is the version within that revision, so the team can keep track of its working versions before the next shared revision. Nobody outside the team should be using it. |
P01, P02… | Shared | A shared draft. The number goes up every time it's shared again, so check you've got the highest one. |
C01, C02… | Published | The published version, authorised and accepted. Higher is newer. Build from the latest C, with an A status. |
Every status and revision code, and the naming rules, are in one place: Lesson 7, The labels.
Based on the UK National Annex to BS EN ISO 19650-2. Your project's information standard can add to it. ISO 19650 and its UK National Annex are © ISO and BSI. InfoTown explains the ideas in its own words, for learning; you'll hear the same language across the industry. Read more for free in the Information Management Initiative (IMI) Framework guidance from BSI and nima. For the full requirements, use the standard itself.