Need to use, stage by stage

Follow the Process

From the client's first need to the drain they're still maintaining five years later. Pick a stage, or follow all 55 stops: watch what gets made, where it goes, and how its label changes along the way.

The process, stop by stop

Who are you?
View by
Pick a stage
Who's on the job Stage 0 · Why we need it
Who is on the job at this stageold assetthe plotClientthe asset ownerThe Outskirtsusers, neighboursthe need: more demandold assetthe plotClientwrites the briefThe Outskirtsold assetsurveyed, peggedClientchooses an optionConsultantsurveys, optionsJOINSThe Outskirtssurveys, optionsold assetsurveyed, peggedthree main contractors, invitedClientbuilds the tender packConsultantwrites the requirementsThe Outskirtsrequirementsout to tenderold assetSite OfficeClientcomments, acceptsMain ContractorTier 1: won the tenderJOINSDesignerappointed by the main contractorJOINSConsultantThe Outskirtsdrawings, modelsplansold assetSite Officethe worksClientClerk of WorksMain Contractorsite teamDesigneranswers questionsSuppliermakes, deliversJOINSThe Outskirtsdeliveries, permitsonto the recorddeliveriesold assetSite Office: packing upnew asset, testedClientaccepts the recordMain Contractorhandover teamDesignerrecord drawings inLEAVESSuppliermanuals inLEAVESThe Outskirtsthe record, asset dataarchive copy homeold assetnew asset, in usethe project site has closed;the plot is part of Client TownClientruns the assetThe OutskirtsusersMain ContractorDesignerSuppliera replacement partJOINSbooked inlessons into the next job
Joins
Leaves
How it travels

Towns keep their places. They join when they're appointed, and leave when their part is done; what they made stays on the record.

Who's on the job, stage by stage
Town0 Why we need it1 What we need2 First ideas3 Pinning it down4 Design it5 Make and build it6 Hand it over7 Use it
Client Townoperations, project leadasset team, project leadproject leadproject leadreviewersClerk of Worksasset team, operatorsoperators, maintenance
Consultant Townsurveyors, advisersadvisers
Main Contractor Townbid, information managersite engineer, supervisorhandover team
Designer Towndesign teamqueriesrecord drawings
Supplier Townmakersmanualsa replacement part
The Outskirtsusers, neighbours    deliveries, permits users
The process map A transit map. Every line meets at the Site Office (the project CDE) in the middle: several cabins inside one fence, for documents, models, maps, the site app and data, joined by one register and one workflow, with a shared room and a published shelf. Main Contractor Town, the lead firm, sits straight above it on the home line, with its Records Office and the parts list. The design line runs to Designer Town at top left, through four checkpoints. The client line runs to Client Town at top right, with its head office and Asset System. The supplier line runs to Supplier Town at bottom left, and the site line to the site at bottom right. Consultant Town, the client's advisers and surveyors, sits at top centre-left, with a dashed road over the top to Client Town: in the early stages there's no Site Office, so their reports go straight to the client. Towns not on the job at the current stop are shown faded, marked not on the job yet or off the job. A dashed tender road joins Main Contractor Town to Client Town before the Site Office exists. Every town checks its own work inside it before anything travels: make, check, review, approve. The site's checks are lighter: make, check, approve. The lines are the workflow: moving along one is a change of state, from work in progress to shared to published. Inside the Site Office, a gate between the shared room and the published shelf is where the lead firm authorises and the client accepts. Parcels move between systems; people, shown as the cast, come to the Site Office to comment, authorise and accept, then go home. DESIGNER TOWN MAIN CONTRACTOR TOWN CLIENT TOWN SUPPLIER TOWN THE SITE CONSULTANT TOWN SITE OFFICE (CDE) DocsModelsMapsSite appData REGISTER · ONE WORKFLOW SHARED PUBLISHED Tier 1: the lead firm the precast works the site app CHECKPOINTSCHECKPOINTSCHECKPOINTS MCRAMCRA DECISION B · AUTHORISE · ACCEPT several cabins, one fence, one workflow tender portal the consultants' road Design team(WIP) Structuresteam RecordsOffice Parts listplanning room Head officethe client Asset Systemthe AIM Advisersfor the client Surveyorsground, ecology MCRAMCRAMCA Design line Client line Home line Supplier line Site line Bidder B Bidder C
A parcel changes state: that's the workflow, between systems or inside one Someone comes to check, comment, authorise, accept or use it Everyone who needs to know is told, with a link Every town checks its own work before it travels: make, check, review, approve. On site it's lighter: make, check, approve, and a photo just needs the right label

What's moving, and its label
Item
Number
Revision
Status
Can you build from it?
Reason for issue
Where
Who's acting
Recorded in the Site Office
The registerEvery item on the job so far, as the CDE sees it at this stop
ItemNumberRevStatusWhere

Want the whole trail as a table, the rules, and every code? Turn on Show the detail at the top of the map.

The whole trail

Every stop, on one page

The same 55 stops as a table: the trail your CDE should be able to show for this one need. This is what "can you prove it?" looks like. Pick a row to see it on the map.

StopStepISO 19650ItemRevStatus (reason for issue)WhereSpins off or links to

Codes on this page: ABC is the design firm, LDF the lead firm, PRE the precast supplier and XYZ the client. IDs like ISS-031 and TQ-024 are illustrative.

The rules Eight rules of the trail

Drawing 042 has one revision history and many linked records. Everything else (issues, mark-ups, TQs, surveys, inspections, shop drawings, packs) is its own parcel, pointing back at the exact revision it relates to.

  1. The revision changes when the content changes. The status changes when the purpose changes. S4 to S5 on the same content is a change to the label in the CDE, not a re-issue.
  2. The status lives in the CDE. The sheet carries the revision and a PRELIMINARY or CONTRACTUAL stamp, matching the P or C. Where a client's title block insists on showing S codes, a status change becomes a content change: re-issue it with the description "Status change only, no technical change".
  3. A published code says which work stage it's accepted for (A5 is Stage 5, A6 is Stage 6), not why. So every published issue also carries a reason for issue from the project's information standard: For construction, For manufacture, Quality record, As-built survey, As-constructed record, Handover. (We say "as-built" in plain words; the reason for issue on the record drawing is As-constructed record.)
  4. Every town checks its own work before it leaves, and the check fits the parcel. A drawing is made, checked, reviewed and approved. A site form is filled in, checked and approved (signed by the supervisor, witnessed where the inspection plan says). A photo needs the right label as it's taken. InfoTown calls these make, check, review, approve; ISO 19650 calls them a quality assurance check, a review, and approval for sharing. Check, review and approve (the team's checkpoints) happen in work in progress, before anything moves to Shared, whoever made it. Authorise and accept (two more checkpoints: the lead firm authorises, then the client accepts) happen in the CDE, before anything moves to Published: the people come to the parcel, the parcel doesn't go to them, and the decision is recorded against the revision.
  5. Only the originator revises its own parcel, in its own room. A mark-up, issue or TQ never changes Drawing 042. It gives the designer a reason to.
  6. Once a drawing is contractual, rework goes back into work in progress as the next P revision: C01, then P04.01 and P04, then C02. Write this into the project's information standard.
  7. Feedback records carry a workflow state (Open, Responded, Closed), not a design status. If the project holds a mark-up as its own container, S2 is a sensible convention, never A.
  8. Every stop must answer "can you prove it?": who, when, which revision, and which record caused it.
Feedback What goes back: red-lines and everything like them

"The red-line goes back" covers at least seven different things. They all point at an exact revision, none of them revise it, and each one ends somewhere different.

FeedbackWhenWhy it happensOwn ID?Goes toEnds asStop
Coordination issueDesign, S1Federated models clash or don't fitYes, issue registerThe originatorNext P revisionClash
Review commentDesign, S3 to S5A reviewer disagrees, queries or spots a gapComment, against the revisionThe originatorNext P revision; comment closed with a responseShare for comment
TQ or RFI with a red-lineBefore buildingSite can't build as drawnYes; mark-up attachedDesigner, via the lead firmAnswer and instruction, then the next C revisionAsk
Non-conformance (NCR)After buildingBuilt wrong or out of toleranceYesLead firm, designer if neededAccept, repair or replace; record updated if accepted as built–
As-built mark-upAs builtSmall differences within tolerance; no question askedYes, or held in the work packOriginator of the record drawingFeeds the A6 record revisionRecord mark-up
SurveyBefore, during and afterExisting conditions, setting out, as-built checkYes, with its own revisionsDesigners and the recordReference, setting-out data or as-built survey (A5)Measure
Inspection and test recordAt hold and witness pointsProving the work meets the published informationYesQuality record and handover packQuality record (A5), handed overInspect

Three tests decide the route. Is it a question? Then it's a TQ or RFI, and someone with authority answers it before work goes ahead. Is it a defect? Then it's an NCR, and the decision on it says whether the record changes. Is it simply what happened? Then it's an as-built mark-up, survey or inspection, and it feeds the record. For models the same rule applies, with structured issues in place of red pen.

Supplier Town Shop drawings: who sees them

A shop drawing is a separate parcel owned by whoever makes the thing, based on a published design revision. It's never the designer's next revision. Who reviews it depends on who carries the design responsibility, and the contract and responsibility matrix should say so before the first one arrives.

WhoWhat they checkDo they always see it?
Manufacturer (the originator)Buildability, tolerances, its own checks: the team's checkpointsYes, they produce it
Designer of recordIt matches the design intent of the revision it's based on, with no new design assumptionsYes, where the item carries design intent: S3 for comment
Lead firmInterfaces, logistics, programme, fit with everything elseYes: it authorises at S4 and releases it as A5, For manufacture
ClientOnly where the contract says so: contractor-designed elements, specified assets, safety-critical itemsNot by default

InfoTown's convention: here the lead firm authorises SD-118 at S4 and releases it as A5 because, by default, it's the accepting party for its own subcontract appointment. Where the client has listed shop drawings as deliverables it wants to review, they go on to S5 for the client to accept, like any other deliverable.

The trail must show which design revision each shop drawing relied on. When 042 moved from C01 to C02, someone had to check SD-118 was still valid. Linking them in the CDE makes that check happen on purpose, not by luck. A firm that designs and makes (a precast firm doing contractor-designed work, say) still sits in Supplier Town, but its design submissions follow the design line's rules.

The site Site packs

A site pack is a list of links to exact published revisions, held in the CDE, not a folder of copies. It answers "what was the site supervisor working from that day?".

  • Only published items go in: drawings at A5 For construction, shop drawings at A5 For manufacture, the inspection plan, RAMS, permits, and any instructions or TQ answers that apply.
  • Never in a pack: anything at an S status, red-lines, or superseded revisions.
  • When a linked item is superseded (042 C01 to C02), the pack is updated, the change is recorded against it and the site team is told. Printed copies say "uncontrolled when printed, check the CDE".
  • The pack has its own number and revision, so the trail can prove which version was on the tablet when the trench was dug.
  • At the end, the pack's inspections and as-built records feed the record drawing and the handover pack. Packs organise construction; they aren't the handover.
Project choices Your project may do it differently

The map shows one good way. The workflow is the idea that matters; the systems and the details are your project's choice, written into its information standard and BEP.

ChoiceOn this pageAlso fine
Where work in progress livesIn each team's own system, in its own town. The Site Office only knows what's been shared.Work-in-progress areas inside the CDE, one per team, so the CDE sees every version. The project decides.
What the CDE isOne Site Office: several cabins (documents, models, maps, the site app, data) inside one fence, running one workflowSeveral systems: documents in a document system, models on a model server or in CAD, maps in GIS, a field app on site. It's still one CDE if it runs one workflow: the same states, labels and decisions, all recorded.
Whose CDEA new Site Office, built by the lead firm because the client asked for oneThe client's own CDE. Then getting ready means getting your team access and testing your workflows in someone else's building.
Where the client acceptsThe client's reviewer comes to the Site OfficeThe client accepts in its own system. Then the parcel does travel up the client line, as a formal transfer, and the decision comes back to be recorded.
How people are toldOne copy; the status changes where it sits; a notification with a link goes to everyone on the distributionConnected systems pick up the new status through their own approved integrations, not side routes. If a system really needs its own copy (the client's document system, an offline tablet), it's a controlled transfer with the same number, revision and status, superseded when the original is. Never re-shared as a new parcel.
Stage namesInfoTown's names for Stages 0 to 7Your client's own stage gates
How the job is boughtDesign and build: the client's consultants take it to the end of Stage 3, then the lead firm joins and brings its own designersBuild only: the client's designers carry on through Stage 4, and the lead firm joins to build. Stages 0 to 3 look the same either way; only who joins next changes.
Who designs after the tenderA new designer, appointed by the lead firmNovation: the client's designer moves across to work for the lead firm. Their work and its record come with them and nothing is redrawn, but who checks and accepts their work changes. Say so in the responsibility matrix before the first drawing moves.
Work stages Stage names, and the ones your job might use

Most UK schemes number the stages 0 to 7 and agree on the numbers, but not the names. InfoTown uses its own plain names. The number is what matters: it's the n in an A code.

#InfoTownRIBA Plan of Work 2020A typical stage set
0Why we need itStrategic DefinitionStrategy
1What we needPreparation and BriefingBrief
2First ideasConcept DesignConcept
3Pinning it downSpatial CoordinationDefinition
4Design itTechnical DesignDesign
5Make and build itManufacturing and ConstructionBuild and Commission
6Hand it overHandoverHandover and Closeout
7Use itUseOperation and End of Life

ISO 19650 works with whatever stages your project uses: RIBA on buildings, the client's own gates on infrastructure. Your project's information standard should say which stages the A codes follow.

UK National Annex The codes used on this page

Status codes

CodeStateWhat that means to youBuild from it?
S0Work in progressSomeone is still working on it in their own team's area. You shouldn't normally see it, and you shouldn't rely on it.No
S1SharedShared so other teams can check their work fits around it. Expect it to change.No
S3SharedShared so people can comment on it. If you've been asked to review it, now's the time to speak up.No
S4SharedShared for the lead firm to review and authorise.Not yet
S5SharedShared for the client to review and accept.Not yet
A1, A2… AnPublishedAuthorised and accepted, with no comments outstanding. The number is the work stage: on this site A5 is construction and A6 is handover and the as-built record.Yes, for that stage, if it's the latest

An S code says what something may be used for. An A code only says it's been authorised and accepted, and the n is the work stage. The Annex ties n to the work stages in BS 8536-1 (buildings) and BS 8536-2 (infrastructure), since brought together in BS 8536:2022, unless your project's information standard sets out another approach. On this site, construction is stage 5 and handover is stage 6, so a construction issue is A5 and the as-built record is A6. Why each A code was issued isn't in the code at all: your project's information standard has to say.

Revision codes

CodeWhenWhat that means to you
P01.01, P01.02…Work in progressStill being worked on. The second number is the version within that revision, so the team can keep track of its working versions before the next shared revision. Nobody outside the team should be using it.
P01, P02…SharedA shared draft. The number goes up every time it's shared again, so check you've got the highest one.
C01, C02…PublishedThe published version, authorised and accepted. Higher is newer. Build from the latest C, with an A status.

Every status and revision code, and the naming rules, are in one place: Lesson 7, The labels.

Based on the UK National Annex to BS EN ISO 19650-2. Your project's information standard can add to it. ISO 19650 and its UK National Annex are © ISO and BSI. InfoTown explains the ideas in its own words, for learning; you'll hear the same language across the industry. Read more for free in the Information Management Initiative (IMI) Framework guidance from BSI and nima. For the full requirements, use the standard itself.