Each task team shows its evidence on people, skills and IT, not a tick. The lead checks it and rolls it up into one summary for the whole team.
Can they actually do it?
Before you start
In the story
Six ticks. One laptop from 2009.
The right way
Every gap gets a plan: training, licences, someone to help, or a different firm.
The groundworks firm starts with logins, a two-hour session and a checklist. IMG_4471 never happens.
A tick isn't evidence. For each firm, what have you actually seen: their logins, their naming, a sample drawing? And not just the shiny models: who plans the work? That's the bit that fails quietly. Where you've seen nothing, what's the plan?
Story 6: The plan for day one
Everyone agrees mobilisation matters. Nobody plans it until it's happening.
The right way, explained
Before a new firm moves into town, someone checks they can drive on its roads. Asking "can you drive?" and accepting a nod isn't a test.
If you're the client
Ask how capability was assessed across the whole team, not just the lead firm. The weakest link sets the pace.
In the town See it in the town: three team photos, and only one of them is honest.
Sam's view: a team photo for every firm. Look for the gaps, and believe the firms that show you theirs.
- 1 Each person carries what they can do (capability), the headcount shows whether there are enough of them (capacity), and the kit on the table shows the IT. The honest firm pins its gap on the photo, with a plan to close it.
- 2 All ticks and no gaps. Either they've done this exact job before, or nobody looked properly.
- 3 Day one: the honest firm's gap is filled. Half the polished firm's team is on the next bid. Check the photo again before any real work starts.
This is the Capability and Capacity Assessment!
Can each firm do it, has it got the people and the kit, and is it still the same team on day one?
For the audit What the auditor will ask
- How did you assess each firm's capability and capacity?
- What did you do about the gaps you found?
For the audit What good evidence looks like
- An assessment for each firm, with evidence behind it.
- One summary for the whole team.
- Actions on the gaps, with training records.
ISO 19650 Capability and capacity
ISO 19650 expects each task team to assess its own capability and capacity, and the lead to bring the results together into one picture of the whole delivery team.
| For each firm | In plain words |
|---|---|
| Capability | Can they do it: the skills, the know-how, the systems? |
| Capacity | Do they have enough people and time to do it on this job? |
| The team summary | One view across every firm, with the gaps showing |
| The gaps | What will be done about each one, by whom and when |
Based on the ISO 19650 series: the ideas come from the standard; the plain-English wording, examples and advice are InfoTown's. ISO 19650 is © ISO and BSI. You'll hear the same language across the industry. Read more for free in the Information Management Initiative (IMI) Framework guidance from BSI and nima. For the full requirements, use the standard itself.