Every drawing, model and record on it, with a firm, a person and a date. The inlet chamber drawing is due in week 6.
Who makes what, and when
The back alley's bill so far: 61 weeks · See the bill
The right way
Owen links the parts list to the build programme. When the programme moves, the drawing dates move with it.
The inlet chamber drawing arrives in week 6, as listed. The fence, which isn't on the list, gets a modest drawing, which is all a fence needs.
Now there is: The whole parts list (the master information delivery plan), with every firm's parts, linked to the programme and kept live.
What's going on here
The parts list is how a job knows what it's making, who's making it and when. Linked to the programme and kept live, it means the drawing site needs next week is already on someone's desk, and a drawing nobody asked for is a sign it's being ignored.
In the town See it in the town: Who's making the drawing site needs next week?
The parts list started life in each deal with the neighbours, one firm's lines at a time. Here it becomes the whole job's parts list, every firm's lines in one place, on the published shelf beside the promise and tied to the build programme so the dates move together. Kept live, it shows a missing inlet chamber drawing early, and a lovingly detailed fence nobody ordered just as quickly.
Fix it Parts list gathering dust? Bring it back to life.
- Check the next month's site activities against the parts list.
- Add anything missing with a firm, a person and a date.
- Link the list to the programme and review both together weekly.
A note for the information manager: Watch for drawings nobody listed as closely as listed ones running late, because both mean the list has stopped steering the work.
Find the next drawing your site needs. Is it on the parts list, with a name and a date?
ISO 19650 From each firm's list to the whole job's
| ISO 19650 says | Means | In the town |
|---|---|---|
| Master information delivery plan (MIDP) | the single plan of all the information the job will deliver, gathered from every task team, with who and when | the whole parts list |
| Task information delivery plan (TIDP) | each task team's own schedule of what it will produce and by when | each firm's lines on the parts list |
| Information delivery milestone | a set point in the job by which particular information must be delivered | the date against each line, moving with the programme |
Based on the ISO 19650 series: the ideas come from the standard; the plain-English wording, examples and advice are InfoTown's. ISO 19650 and its UK National Annex are © ISO and BSI. You'll hear the same language across the industry. Read more for free in the Information Management Initiative (IMI) Framework guidance from BSI and nima. For the full requirements, use the standard itself.